欧美精品在线第一页,久久av影院,午夜视频在线播放一三,久久91精品久久久久久秒播,成人一区三区,久久综合狠狠综合久久狠狠色综合,成人av一区二区亚洲精,欧美a级在线观看
 
Analysis: U.S. "ultimatum" on INF treaty self-centered, detrimental
                 Source: Xinhua | 2018-12-06 22:31:59 | Editor: huaxia

File Photo: U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Russian President Vladimir Putin attend a joint press conference in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. (Xinhua/Lehtikuva/Jussi Nukari)

WASHINGTON, Dec. 5 (Xinhua) -- Washington has sent an "ultimatum" to Moscow by threatening to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in the following two months, a move experts believe is self-centered and counterproductive.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Tuesday in Brussels that the United States would suspend its obligations under the INF Treaty in 60 days unless Russia returns to full compliance with the agreement.

"The burden falls on Russia to make the necessary changes," Pompeo said in a press conference of NATO foreign ministers meeting.

Russia opposes the U.S. withdrawal from the treaty and will respond "in an appropriate manner," Russian President Vladimir Putin responded on Wednesday.

For years, Moscow and Washington have traded accusations of non-compliance with the INF Treaty, which was signed in 1987 between the Soviet Union and the United States on the elimination of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.

It marked the first-ever pact reached by Washington and Moscow on nuclear disarmament and a major step forward in restricting arms race.

Experts say Washington's withdrawal would put the whole world in an arms control crisis and the United States seeks to gain more from quitting the deal.

"Russia is not the major reason of U.S. decision to withdraw from the treaty; the United States itself is," said Li Bin, a senior fellow of Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Li said some people in the United States believe that "no other country could prevail the United States in an arms race" without the agreements.

As far back as 2013, Pentagon was considering various technologies that the United States could develop should Washington walk away from the INF Treaty, according to U.S. media reports.

Moscow also questioned Washington's integrity by crafting such a hedging strategy with regard to the INF Treaty.

Putin said on Wednesday that the U.S. Congress allocated money for the development of missiles banned by the treaty even before Washington announced its withdrawal from the pact.

The abandonment of the deal also aroused speculation on whether the United States would develop and deploy ground-based intermediate-range missiles in the near future.

"Since Democrats have controlled the House of Representatives, I doubt they would be supportive to those systems because of the cost, and the need is not proven," said Mark Fitzpatrick, executive director of International Institute of Strategic Studies-Americas.

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the advocacy group Arms Control Association, said on Tuesday that if NATO members want to preserve the INF Treaty that has enhanced their security for more than two decades, they should insist that the United States and Russia exhaust diplomatic options.

Unfortunately, Pompeo provided no indication that the United States wanted to make a final effort to save the treaty by engaging in talks with Russia to address the compliance concerns raised by Washington and Moscow, said Kimball.

Besides, the potential collapse of the INF Treaty would leave the fate of the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty (New START) between Washington and Moscow uncertain.

Breaking arms control agreements was much easier than concluding them, said Alexey Arbatov, an international security expert of Moscow-based Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations.

"But history shows that rejecting arms control agreements never improves one's security and always damages it," said Arbatov.

Back to Top Close
Xinhuanet

Analysis: U.S. "ultimatum" on INF treaty self-centered, detrimental

Source: Xinhua 2018-12-06 22:31:59

File Photo: U.S. President Donald Trump (L) and Russian President Vladimir Putin attend a joint press conference in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. (Xinhua/Lehtikuva/Jussi Nukari)

WASHINGTON, Dec. 5 (Xinhua) -- Washington has sent an "ultimatum" to Moscow by threatening to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in the following two months, a move experts believe is self-centered and counterproductive.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Tuesday in Brussels that the United States would suspend its obligations under the INF Treaty in 60 days unless Russia returns to full compliance with the agreement.

"The burden falls on Russia to make the necessary changes," Pompeo said in a press conference of NATO foreign ministers meeting.

Russia opposes the U.S. withdrawal from the treaty and will respond "in an appropriate manner," Russian President Vladimir Putin responded on Wednesday.

For years, Moscow and Washington have traded accusations of non-compliance with the INF Treaty, which was signed in 1987 between the Soviet Union and the United States on the elimination of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.

It marked the first-ever pact reached by Washington and Moscow on nuclear disarmament and a major step forward in restricting arms race.

Experts say Washington's withdrawal would put the whole world in an arms control crisis and the United States seeks to gain more from quitting the deal.

"Russia is not the major reason of U.S. decision to withdraw from the treaty; the United States itself is," said Li Bin, a senior fellow of Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Li said some people in the United States believe that "no other country could prevail the United States in an arms race" without the agreements.

As far back as 2013, Pentagon was considering various technologies that the United States could develop should Washington walk away from the INF Treaty, according to U.S. media reports.

Moscow also questioned Washington's integrity by crafting such a hedging strategy with regard to the INF Treaty.

Putin said on Wednesday that the U.S. Congress allocated money for the development of missiles banned by the treaty even before Washington announced its withdrawal from the pact.

The abandonment of the deal also aroused speculation on whether the United States would develop and deploy ground-based intermediate-range missiles in the near future.

"Since Democrats have controlled the House of Representatives, I doubt they would be supportive to those systems because of the cost, and the need is not proven," said Mark Fitzpatrick, executive director of International Institute of Strategic Studies-Americas.

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the advocacy group Arms Control Association, said on Tuesday that if NATO members want to preserve the INF Treaty that has enhanced their security for more than two decades, they should insist that the United States and Russia exhaust diplomatic options.

Unfortunately, Pompeo provided no indication that the United States wanted to make a final effort to save the treaty by engaging in talks with Russia to address the compliance concerns raised by Washington and Moscow, said Kimball.

Besides, the potential collapse of the INF Treaty would leave the fate of the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reductions Treaty (New START) between Washington and Moscow uncertain.

Breaking arms control agreements was much easier than concluding them, said Alexey Arbatov, an international security expert of Moscow-based Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations.

"But history shows that rejecting arms control agreements never improves one's security and always damages it," said Arbatov.

010020070750000000000000011100001376557191
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久国产精品广西柳州门| 久久国产精彩视频| 国产精品一区二区av麻豆| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区五区| 日本一区二区电影在线观看 | 国产午夜精品一区二区理论影院 | 精品久久久久99| 美女直播一区二区三区| 日韩欧美国产另类| 国产69精品久久久久9999不卡免费| 中文文精品字幕一区二区| 欧美一区二区三区三州| 91麻豆精品国产综合久久久久久| 亚洲国产偷| 国产婷婷色一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美一区二区精品性| 午夜亚洲国产理论片一二三四| 年轻bbwbbw高潮| 日本一二三区视频在线| 亚洲国产精品麻豆| 精品欧美一区二区精品久久小说| 国产精品免费自拍| 国产欧美一区二区三区沐欲| 国产精品一二三区免费| 中文字幕理伦片免费看| av国产精品毛片一区二区小说| 人人玩人人添人人澡97| 国产精品久久99| av不卡一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美91| 午夜免费av电影| 91精品美女| 久久99精品国产麻豆婷婷| 午夜一级电影| 日本精品一区二区三区在线观看视频| 欧美日韩九区| 91精品视频在线观看免费| 欧美日韩国产精品综合| 久久久精品欧美一区二区免费| 国产91精品高清一区二区三区| 538国产精品一区二区免费视频| 久久一区二区三区视频| 日韩精品一区在线视频| 久久九精品| 午夜av片| 欧美一级片一区| 日韩精品免费一区二区中文字幕| 欧美一区二区三区久久精品视| 国内精品久久久久影院日本| 国产日韩欧美第一页| 一级久久久| 激情aⅴ欧美一区二区三区| 在线国产一区二区| 亚洲精品91久久久久久| 91超碰caoporm国产香蕉| 国产精品亚发布| 中文文精品字幕一区二区| 久久一区二区视频| 亚洲精品国产精品国自产网站按摩| 麻豆国产一区二区三区| 99久久夜色精品国产网站| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久,亚洲午夜| 国产美女三级无套内谢| 国产精品久久久久久久四虎电影| 午夜一区二区视频| 亚洲精品一区二区另类图片| 午夜影皖精品av在线播放| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 91精品视频在线观看免费| 久久中文一区| 国产二区精品视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲美女高潮| 亚洲1区2区3区4区| 亚洲码在线| 精品国产区一区二| 亚洲精品无吗| 国产精品电影一区| 色噜噜狠狠狠狠色综合久| 日日夜夜亚洲精品| 国产99网站| 欧美一区二区三区激情视频| 国产69精品久久99不卡解锁版|