"/>

        欧美精品在线第一页,久久av影院,午夜视频在线播放一三,久久91精品久久久久久秒播,成人一区三区,久久综合狠狠综合久久狠狠色综合,成人av一区二区亚洲精,欧美a级在线观看

        California's rebellious "sanctuary state" law faces rebellion

        Source: Xinhua    2018-05-07 05:05:01

        By Peter Mertz

        LOS ANGELES, May 6 (Xinhua) -- California conservative lawmakers continued this week to support Trump Administration immigration policy, a move that enflamed again the war of words in the state and feud between the America's most populous state and Washington.

        TANGLED LAW WARFARE

        California made history by becoming the first "Sanctuary State" in the country as a new law, which was called SB (Senate Bill) 54 before being signed by Governor Jerry Brown last October, showing a will to resist the White House's immigration policy, went into effect from the first day of this year.

        Then the Golden State had to face pressure from the federal government for its rebellious move. Early March, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state, its governor, and its attorney general, accusing them of violating the U.S. Constitution.

        This legal move was compared by Jerry Brown to "an act of war", but more challenges to the law, which vastly limits cooperation between state and local law enforcement officers with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, emerged inside his state.

        Costa Mesa, a tiny city of 110,000 residents south of Los Angeles, made another loud national statement with a 3-2 vote last Wednesday to oppose the state's "sanctuary state" law. It is the latest Orange County governing body to declare official opposition.

        The opposition to SB 54 started in March when Orange County's second-smallest city - Los Alamitos - voted 4-1 to exempt itself from California's sanctuary law.

        That move triggered Orange County's Republican-controlled county council to vote unanimously later that month to do the same - defy the state sanctuary laws - and move immigration control to the local level.

        County council members in the majority said SB-54 puts them at odds with the U.S. Constitution and also joined the federal lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.

        Orange County lawmakers cited examples of "illegal" immigrants convicted of domestic violence that were re-released into the public, while liberal opponents voiced dismay at a move that will target minority populations.

        California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he would fight Orange County in court, as all sides prepared for battle. "State law is state law," Becerra said in a news conference last month.

        "We want to make sure that every jurisdiction, including Orange County, understands what state law requires of the people and the subdivisions of the state of California," he said, warning "It's my job to enforce state law and I will do so."

        But now Becerra must file a long list of defendants to the court if he launched a law war against the rebellious cities. Besides of Costa Mesa, at least another 13 cities in Orange County voted against the "sanctuary law" and the neighbour San Diego County also decided to back Trump' s challenge against the state on this issue.

        CLEAR DIVISION LINE

        "Costa Mesa has been a conservative stronghold since the Nixon and Reagan years," said San Luis Obispo business owner John Ott.

        "Lots of rich, retired white folk live there - not a surprise vote - in fact, I'm surprised it was so close," Ott told Xinhua Friday.

        Orange County is more populous than 21 U.S. states, the sixth most populous country in America, and has only voted for only one democratic presidential candidate since 1936, who was Hillary Clinton.

        "The 3-2 Costa Mesa vote was not unanimous - in fact very close," said Hollywood film editor Tim Craig, "Hey, it's Orange County, what else would you expect?"

        The debate in Costa Mesa city council Wednesday morning was unexpected fierce. More than 100 people spoke on the issue over more than four hours in front of a large and sometimes rowdy crowd.

        People in the audience expressed both sides of the issue, waving American flags and holding signs with messages such as "Immigrants in, racists out," "You must uphold the Constitution," "Respect our country" and "I support safe communities, I support SB 54."

        Chairwomen of the meeting repeatedly admonished the audience for interrupting speakers with applause or boos. Several times she threatened to clear the chamber if the crowd didn't pipe down, and she asked police officers to temporarily remove people who were being disruptive.

        Costa Mesa's vote dismayed civil rights groups across America.

        "America is going backwards...marching to the Trump manifesto," political analyst David B. Richardson told Xinhua Saturday.

        "There's been a real shift to a national, xenophobic acceptability in our society that is heartbreaking," said Rabbi Jonathan Klein, executive director of the Clergy & Laity United for Economic Justice group on Twitter.

        "We're in an era of open bigotry," Klein said.

        "It has nothing to do with bigotry," countered former U.S. Navy engineer Kirk Blue. "Police are trained to protect the public and if that means including demographic data, then it's crazy to hamper their work," he told Xinhua.

        "Clearly the residents of Orange County want more law enforcement, not less," Blue said Saturday.

        MORE SAFEY?

        Costa Mesa's council members who supported the resolution said what they concerned most about SB 54 is that in many cases it prohibits local and state police agencies from notifying federal officials when they're about to release immigrants in their custody who may be subject to deportation.

        "If you are putting people back on the street and then trying to re-apprehend them ... that puts people at risk," Mayor Sandy Genis said after the vote.

        On the contrary, liberals told Xinhua that opposing the law would open the door to civil right's violations, and add work for already overburdened town cops who would be assisting in enforcement.

        "The foremost spokesman for local enforcement of immigration laws - Arizona's Joe Arpaio - was also heavily criticized for ignoring reports of sexual assault when they came from Latina and Black women," said former U.S. State Department official Stewart King.

        King told Xinhua that the Costa Mesa vote not only puts local cops on the firing line, but is simply not their job.

        "This is the job for (U.S.) Immigration and Naturalization (INS) officials - not the work of local sheriffs," said Louis Cardona, a former Arizona resident who told Xinhua he was personally abused by Arpiao's forces.

        "Arpiao had hundreds of sexual assault allegations go without investigation," said King, echoing social media concerned tweets after the Costa Mesa vote - that local law enforcement and immigration do not mix.

        "Oregon has had a similar law since the 1980s," said King, a college history professor.

        "State and local police are not empowered, funded, or trained to enforce immigration laws - that is the responsibility of federal immigration authorities," he told Xinhua.

        Editor: yan
        Related News
        Xinhuanet

        California's rebellious "sanctuary state" law faces rebellion

        Source: Xinhua 2018-05-07 05:05:01

        By Peter Mertz

        LOS ANGELES, May 6 (Xinhua) -- California conservative lawmakers continued this week to support Trump Administration immigration policy, a move that enflamed again the war of words in the state and feud between the America's most populous state and Washington.

        TANGLED LAW WARFARE

        California made history by becoming the first "Sanctuary State" in the country as a new law, which was called SB (Senate Bill) 54 before being signed by Governor Jerry Brown last October, showing a will to resist the White House's immigration policy, went into effect from the first day of this year.

        Then the Golden State had to face pressure from the federal government for its rebellious move. Early March, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the state, its governor, and its attorney general, accusing them of violating the U.S. Constitution.

        This legal move was compared by Jerry Brown to "an act of war", but more challenges to the law, which vastly limits cooperation between state and local law enforcement officers with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, emerged inside his state.

        Costa Mesa, a tiny city of 110,000 residents south of Los Angeles, made another loud national statement with a 3-2 vote last Wednesday to oppose the state's "sanctuary state" law. It is the latest Orange County governing body to declare official opposition.

        The opposition to SB 54 started in March when Orange County's second-smallest city - Los Alamitos - voted 4-1 to exempt itself from California's sanctuary law.

        That move triggered Orange County's Republican-controlled county council to vote unanimously later that month to do the same - defy the state sanctuary laws - and move immigration control to the local level.

        County council members in the majority said SB-54 puts them at odds with the U.S. Constitution and also joined the federal lawsuit against California's sanctuary laws.

        Orange County lawmakers cited examples of "illegal" immigrants convicted of domestic violence that were re-released into the public, while liberal opponents voiced dismay at a move that will target minority populations.

        California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he would fight Orange County in court, as all sides prepared for battle. "State law is state law," Becerra said in a news conference last month.

        "We want to make sure that every jurisdiction, including Orange County, understands what state law requires of the people and the subdivisions of the state of California," he said, warning "It's my job to enforce state law and I will do so."

        But now Becerra must file a long list of defendants to the court if he launched a law war against the rebellious cities. Besides of Costa Mesa, at least another 13 cities in Orange County voted against the "sanctuary law" and the neighbour San Diego County also decided to back Trump' s challenge against the state on this issue.

        CLEAR DIVISION LINE

        "Costa Mesa has been a conservative stronghold since the Nixon and Reagan years," said San Luis Obispo business owner John Ott.

        "Lots of rich, retired white folk live there - not a surprise vote - in fact, I'm surprised it was so close," Ott told Xinhua Friday.

        Orange County is more populous than 21 U.S. states, the sixth most populous country in America, and has only voted for only one democratic presidential candidate since 1936, who was Hillary Clinton.

        "The 3-2 Costa Mesa vote was not unanimous - in fact very close," said Hollywood film editor Tim Craig, "Hey, it's Orange County, what else would you expect?"

        The debate in Costa Mesa city council Wednesday morning was unexpected fierce. More than 100 people spoke on the issue over more than four hours in front of a large and sometimes rowdy crowd.

        People in the audience expressed both sides of the issue, waving American flags and holding signs with messages such as "Immigrants in, racists out," "You must uphold the Constitution," "Respect our country" and "I support safe communities, I support SB 54."

        Chairwomen of the meeting repeatedly admonished the audience for interrupting speakers with applause or boos. Several times she threatened to clear the chamber if the crowd didn't pipe down, and she asked police officers to temporarily remove people who were being disruptive.

        Costa Mesa's vote dismayed civil rights groups across America.

        "America is going backwards...marching to the Trump manifesto," political analyst David B. Richardson told Xinhua Saturday.

        "There's been a real shift to a national, xenophobic acceptability in our society that is heartbreaking," said Rabbi Jonathan Klein, executive director of the Clergy & Laity United for Economic Justice group on Twitter.

        "We're in an era of open bigotry," Klein said.

        "It has nothing to do with bigotry," countered former U.S. Navy engineer Kirk Blue. "Police are trained to protect the public and if that means including demographic data, then it's crazy to hamper their work," he told Xinhua.

        "Clearly the residents of Orange County want more law enforcement, not less," Blue said Saturday.

        MORE SAFEY?

        Costa Mesa's council members who supported the resolution said what they concerned most about SB 54 is that in many cases it prohibits local and state police agencies from notifying federal officials when they're about to release immigrants in their custody who may be subject to deportation.

        "If you are putting people back on the street and then trying to re-apprehend them ... that puts people at risk," Mayor Sandy Genis said after the vote.

        On the contrary, liberals told Xinhua that opposing the law would open the door to civil right's violations, and add work for already overburdened town cops who would be assisting in enforcement.

        "The foremost spokesman for local enforcement of immigration laws - Arizona's Joe Arpaio - was also heavily criticized for ignoring reports of sexual assault when they came from Latina and Black women," said former U.S. State Department official Stewart King.

        King told Xinhua that the Costa Mesa vote not only puts local cops on the firing line, but is simply not their job.

        "This is the job for (U.S.) Immigration and Naturalization (INS) officials - not the work of local sheriffs," said Louis Cardona, a former Arizona resident who told Xinhua he was personally abused by Arpiao's forces.

        "Arpiao had hundreds of sexual assault allegations go without investigation," said King, echoing social media concerned tweets after the Costa Mesa vote - that local law enforcement and immigration do not mix.

        "Oregon has had a similar law since the 1980s," said King, a college history professor.

        "State and local police are not empowered, funded, or trained to enforce immigration laws - that is the responsibility of federal immigration authorities," he told Xinhua.

        [Editor: huaxia]
        010020070750000000000000011105521371599871
        主站蜘蛛池模板: 男女午夜爽爽| 欧美激情片一区二区| 满春阁精品av在线导航| 美国一级片免费观看| 国产在线欧美在线| 国产视频一区二区在线播放| 一区二区三区毛片| xxxx18hd护士hd护士| 日本一区二区三区免费视频| 久久国产精品99国产精| 欧美国产三区| 精品999久久久| 久久99精品久久久秒播| 中文字幕久久精品一区| 97欧美精品| 国产精品影音先锋| 国产精品视频二区三区| 国产一卡二卡在线播放 | 中文字幕一区二区三区又粗| 天干天干天干夜夜爽av| 亚洲乱小说| 国产日韩欧美专区| 91久久综合亚洲鲁鲁五月天| 黄毛片在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲综合| 国产97在线看| 波多野结衣巨乳女教师| 日韩欧美精品一区二区| 一区二区三区欧美在线| 日韩毛片一区| 99国产精品免费| 国产人伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线网址| 窝窝午夜精品一区二区| 国产aⅴ精品久久久久久| 久久一区二区精品视频| 国产一区欧美一区| 国产日本欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩视频一区| 久久一区二区三区视频| 免费看片一区二区三区| 国产精品欧美一区二区视频| 午夜av男人的天堂| 26uuu亚洲电影在线观看| 日韩精品久久一区二区三区| 国产精品久久亚洲7777| 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线播放 | 午夜激情电影院| 国产精华一区二区精华| 综合在线一区| 国产一区二区午夜| 91性高湖久久久久久久久_久久99| 免费看大黄毛片全集免费| 欧美性猛交xxxxxⅹxx88| 亚洲第一天堂无码专区| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区五区| 国产91清纯白嫩初高中在线观看 | 久久精品中文字幕一区| 欧美一区二区三区性| 91精品久| **毛片在线| 欧美日韩一区电影| 日本少妇高潮xxxxⅹ| 亚洲少妇一区二区三区| 国产欧美一区二区三区免费看 | 国产色午夜婷婷一区二区三区| 久久影视一区二区| 欧美一级久久精品| 李采潭伦理bd播放| 国产精品视频久久久久| 国产精品视频1区| 91免费国产视频| 国产精品综合在线| 国产视频精品久久| 国产精品一区二| 午夜看片网站| 久久久精品中文| 午夜激情影院| 高清欧美xxxx| 国产一级片大全| 91精品国产综合久久福利软件| 强制中出し~大桥未久4| 性刺激久久久久久久久九色| 午夜精品99| 国产91久久久久久久免费| 欧美日韩国产精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区大片| 国产韩国精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码| 亚洲欧美一卡| 波多野结衣女教师30分钟| 97香蕉久久国产超碰青草软件| 色综合欧美亚洲国产| 狠狠综合久久av一区二区老牛| 亚洲国产一区二| 欧美一区二区久久| 中文字幕在线一区二区三区| 午夜免费片| 亚洲精品一区中文字幕| 精品特级毛片| 国产91免费在线| 欧美一区二区三区视频在线观看| 99爱精品在线| 久久99精品久久久大学生| 国内精品国产三级国产99| 午夜亚洲影院| 国产99视频精品免视看芒果| 中文字幕一二三四五区| 国偷自产一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜电影三级| 午夜伦全在线观看| 久久久人成影片免费观看| 午夜老司机电影| 日本午夜一区二区| 久爱视频精品| 午夜在线看片| 中文字幕一区三区| 国偷自产中文字幕亚洲手机在线| 人人澡超碰碰97碰碰碰| 欧美网站一区二区三区| www色视频岛国| 午夜爽爽视频| 国产乱子一区二区| 国产91免费在线| 国产麻豆一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品第157页| 欧美乱偷一区二区三区在线| 国产韩国精品一区二区三区| 中文乱码字幕永久永久电影| 99er热精品视频国产| **毛片免费| 狠狠躁夜夜躁2020| 亚洲国产偷| 国产欧美日韩精品在线| 狠狠躁夜夜躁| 亚洲少妇一区二区| 欧美日韩激情在线| 日韩欧美激情| 97国产精品久久| 国产电影精品一区二区三区| 国产在线卡一卡二| 午夜影院伦理片| 久久99精品久久久大学生| 国产一区日韩一区| 亚洲天堂国产精品| 91久久精品久久国产性色也91| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 国产精品久久免费视频| 精品在线观看一区二区| 日日夜夜精品免费看| 亚洲三区二区一区| 538在线一区二区精品国产| 大伊人av| 国产理论片午午午伦夜理片2021| 99久久精品免费看国产免费粉嫩| 91精品久久久久久综合五月天| 欧美精品乱码视频一二专区| 精品一区二区三区影院| 欧美日韩精品不卡一区二区三区 | 午夜免费片| 久久国产精品首页| 欧美日韩亚洲另类| 国产91免费在线| 欧美激情在线免费| 日韩亚洲精品在线观看| 国产精品一区二区人人爽| 一区二区三区电影在线观看| 欧美午夜精品一区二区三区| 久久91精品国产91久久久| 国产精品999久久久| 欧美激情国产一区| 麻豆国产一区二区| 国产一卡在线| 李采潭无删减版大尺度| 国产一区二区高潮| 狠狠干一区| 欧美日韩激情一区| 欧美日韩国产一二| 7799国产精品久久99| 精品特级毛片| 欧美日韩一区二区三区精品| 国产偷久久一区精品69| 99精品国产99久久久久久97| 精品一区二区三区影院| 久久精品—区二区三区| 欧美xxxxhdvideos| 精品中文久久| 国产日本一区二区三区| 日韩av电影手机在线观看| 91精品国产麻豆国产自产在线| 久久99精品国产| 一色桃子av大全在线播放| 亚洲精品一区在线| 午夜wwww| 中文字幕区一区二| 91麻豆产精品久久久| 蜜臀久久99精品久久久久久网站| 色综合久久网| 亚洲视频h| 午夜伦理在线观看| 亚洲四区在线| 韩漫无遮韩漫免费网址肉| 天天干狠狠插| 久久三级精品| 国产精品一二二区| 欧美精品免费视频| 欧美精品粉嫩高潮一区二区| 欧美3级在线| 538国产精品一区二区免费视频| 亚洲欧美国产精品va在线观看| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨大胸 | 国产偷久久一区精品69| 亚洲精品一区二区三区98年| 精品国产伦一区二区三区免费| 久久夜色精品国产噜噜麻豆| 久久久久久久国产精品视频| 少妇高潮一区二区三区99小说| 亚洲精品日韩在线| 精品少妇一区二区三区免费观看焕| 亚洲欧美v国产一区二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜糖图片| 精品久久一区| 午夜影院啊啊啊| 久久国产麻豆| xxxx18hd护士hd护士| 国产伦理精品一区二区三区观看体验 | 国产精品日韩视频| 欧美日韩一级在线观看| 亚洲欧美国产日韩综合| 久久夜色精品国产噜噜麻豆| 93久久精品日日躁夜夜躁欧美| 中文字幕a一二三在线| 久久精品com| 欧美国产亚洲精品| 亚洲一区中文字幕| 少妇特黄v一区二区三区图片| 日本精品三区| 一区二区免费在线观看| 国产jizz18女人高潮| 99三级视频| 国产91在线播放| 日韩亚洲精品在线| 国产一二区在线| 精品久久久综合| 亚洲精品国产主播一区| 久久午夜鲁丝片午夜精品|