欧美精品在线第一页,久久av影院,午夜视频在线播放一三,久久91精品久久久久久秒播,成人一区三区,久久综合狠狠综合久久狠狠色综合,成人av一区二区亚洲精,欧美a级在线观看
 
Interview: Brexit talks are art of giving up rather than having it all: expert
                 Source: Xinhua | 2018-03-31 18:42:20 | Editor: huaxia

Photo taken on June 24, 2016 shows then British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) leaving with his wife Samantha after his speech at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain. Cameron announced his intention to step down after his country has voted to leave the European Union (EU). (Xinhua/Han Yan)

BRUSSELS, March 31 (Xinhua) -- The hard question during Brexit talks will be what about both sides are prepared to give up, said Maria Demertzis, deputy director of the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel.

Commenting on the outcomes of the European Union (EU) summit last week, Demertzis told Xinhua in an exclusive interview recently that any credible progress would be one in which the issue of Northern Ireland is resolved.

"This will be the sole criteria of what would be a credible progress because unless the Northern Island issue is resolved, it's very difficult to see what type of trade agreement we will have. I think the two are very closely interlinked," she said.

During the summit, EU27 leaders endorsed guidelines for the second phase Brexit talks and a transitional deal agreeing a contentious "backstop solution" keeping Northern Ireland signed up to EU rules in order to avoid a hard border with the Republic of Ireland.

Suggesting "you can't have both ways," Demertzis said if Northern Island is kept in the customs union without the rest of Britain, it would mean a hard border on the sea.

"I don't see how this can work unless something is done in the direction of a virtual border. Everything is being done digitally, but even that I'm not entirely sure how workable it is," she said.

Given the green light by EU27 leaders during the two-day summit, the guidelines were widely seen as a starting point for EU-Britain future relationship talks.

Local media widely expected that the talks' starting point would be Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)-type, i.e. the "Canadian" model, or European Economic Area (EEA)-type, the Norwegian model.

A CETA-type trade deal offers relatively limited access in services, with no passporting rights for financial services -- an important sector for Britain.

On the other hand, an EEA-type agreement would give Britain much of what it is looking for in trade, including passporting rights for financial services. But it also requires free movement of labor -- a demand that Britain is not willing to accept.

"I think the UK would prefer to start from a CETA agreement and then add to it something for financial services ... I think the UK will capitulate at some point and probably try and arrange something along the lines of what the EU asks," said Demertzis.

"But again that's going to be a difficult thing to sell at home (in Britain). You might create domestically some political instability," she noted, adding that "the EU would prefer something much closer to what we have right now."

The final results would be determined only by the threat of a very hard Brexit close at the time, she noted.

"Typically how the EU works -- always on the last minute it notches up a deal. I hope it's a good economic deal but I think that at some point the UK is going to have sort of putting a lot of water in the wine and accept that for economic gains they need to abide by the EU legislation," said the economist.

To Demertzis, the best outcome for the future relationship would be something like the EEA but at the same time allowing for the fact that Britain won a referendum on limiting the movement of labor.

"Economically it's a good outcome and it allows the UK to declare a victory at home by saying that we have restricted the movement of labor, which is the whole point of this referendum," she said.

In addition, the EEA-minus agreement also implies that the EU is ready to accept that the four freedoms (free movement of goods, services and capital and labor) are not unbreakable, she said.

"That is difficult but in my view the EU need to accept that because you have a country that is leaving. They (British people) have the right to determine this. At the same time, they do not destroy the economic relationships that we have established after 50 years of cooperation, so that I think would be the best outcome ought to be," she said.

Back to Top Close
Xinhuanet

Interview: Brexit talks are art of giving up rather than having it all: expert

Source: Xinhua 2018-03-31 18:42:20

Photo taken on June 24, 2016 shows then British Prime Minister David Cameron (L) leaving with his wife Samantha after his speech at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain. Cameron announced his intention to step down after his country has voted to leave the European Union (EU). (Xinhua/Han Yan)

BRUSSELS, March 31 (Xinhua) -- The hard question during Brexit talks will be what about both sides are prepared to give up, said Maria Demertzis, deputy director of the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel.

Commenting on the outcomes of the European Union (EU) summit last week, Demertzis told Xinhua in an exclusive interview recently that any credible progress would be one in which the issue of Northern Ireland is resolved.

"This will be the sole criteria of what would be a credible progress because unless the Northern Island issue is resolved, it's very difficult to see what type of trade agreement we will have. I think the two are very closely interlinked," she said.

During the summit, EU27 leaders endorsed guidelines for the second phase Brexit talks and a transitional deal agreeing a contentious "backstop solution" keeping Northern Ireland signed up to EU rules in order to avoid a hard border with the Republic of Ireland.

Suggesting "you can't have both ways," Demertzis said if Northern Island is kept in the customs union without the rest of Britain, it would mean a hard border on the sea.

"I don't see how this can work unless something is done in the direction of a virtual border. Everything is being done digitally, but even that I'm not entirely sure how workable it is," she said.

Given the green light by EU27 leaders during the two-day summit, the guidelines were widely seen as a starting point for EU-Britain future relationship talks.

Local media widely expected that the talks' starting point would be Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)-type, i.e. the "Canadian" model, or European Economic Area (EEA)-type, the Norwegian model.

A CETA-type trade deal offers relatively limited access in services, with no passporting rights for financial services -- an important sector for Britain.

On the other hand, an EEA-type agreement would give Britain much of what it is looking for in trade, including passporting rights for financial services. But it also requires free movement of labor -- a demand that Britain is not willing to accept.

"I think the UK would prefer to start from a CETA agreement and then add to it something for financial services ... I think the UK will capitulate at some point and probably try and arrange something along the lines of what the EU asks," said Demertzis.

"But again that's going to be a difficult thing to sell at home (in Britain). You might create domestically some political instability," she noted, adding that "the EU would prefer something much closer to what we have right now."

The final results would be determined only by the threat of a very hard Brexit close at the time, she noted.

"Typically how the EU works -- always on the last minute it notches up a deal. I hope it's a good economic deal but I think that at some point the UK is going to have sort of putting a lot of water in the wine and accept that for economic gains they need to abide by the EU legislation," said the economist.

To Demertzis, the best outcome for the future relationship would be something like the EEA but at the same time allowing for the fact that Britain won a referendum on limiting the movement of labor.

"Economically it's a good outcome and it allows the UK to declare a victory at home by saying that we have restricted the movement of labor, which is the whole point of this referendum," she said.

In addition, the EEA-minus agreement also implies that the EU is ready to accept that the four freedoms (free movement of goods, services and capital and labor) are not unbreakable, she said.

"That is difficult but in my view the EU need to accept that because you have a country that is leaving. They (British people) have the right to determine this. At the same time, they do not destroy the economic relationships that we have established after 50 years of cooperation, so that I think would be the best outcome ought to be," she said.

010020070750000000000000011100001370792551
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美亚洲视频二区| 久久久久久亚洲精品| 国产精品香蕉在线的人| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费动态图| 亚洲精品色婷婷| 日韩精品中文字幕一区二区| 亚洲乱亚洲乱妇50p| 一本久久精品一区二区| 亚洲精品一区二区另类图片| 精品在线观看一区二区| 久久国产欧美一区二区免费| 亚洲国产99| 2023国产精品久久久精品双| 国产1区2区3区| 91精品综合| 肥大bbwbbwbbw高潮| 亚洲一二区在线观看| 午夜激情看片| 亚洲欧美日韩精品在线观看| 精品国产一区二区在线| 久久99亚洲精品久久99果| 中文字幕一区二区三区日韩精品| 538国产精品一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区| 日韩午夜毛片| 国产亚洲综合一区二区| 国产一级片网站| 99视频一区| 国产精品一区二区三| 日本午夜无人区毛片私人影院| 日本精品视频一区二区三区 | 国产福利一区在线观看| 国产一级片网站| 精品久久久综合| 一区二区三区在线影院| 性国产日韩欧美一区二区在线| 欧美午夜看片在线观看字幕| 蜜臀久久久久久999| 国产一区在线视频观看| 韩国女主播一区二区| 日本看片一区二区三区高清| 91精品国产九九九久久久亚洲| 国产一区激情| 日韩av在线一区| 亚洲精品456| 精品国产九九九| 亚洲精品卡一| 欧美资源一区| 一区二区三区欧美在线| 国产一区二区影院| 国产精品九九九九九| 国产精品久久久久久久久久久久久久不卡 | 亚洲国产99| 欧美日韩亚洲另类| 性欧美1819sex性高播放| 香蕉av一区二区三区| 欧美精品一级二级| 精品久久综合1区2区3区激情| 日韩国产欧美中文字幕| 日韩欧美中文字幕精品| 波多野结衣女教师电影| 日韩精品一区二区三区免费观看| 蜜臀久久久久久999| 久久久久偷看国产亚洲87| 日韩中文字幕在线一区| 在线精品国产一区二区三区88| 久久99久久99精品蜜柚传媒| 国产精品伦一区二区三区级视频频 | 久久精品手机视频| 国产99视频精品免视看芒果| 精品久久不卡| 亚洲一卡二卡在线| 国产无套精品一区二区| 国产精品96久久久久久又黄又硬| 娇妻被又大又粗又长又硬好爽 | 欧美日韩久久一区| 狠狠色很很在鲁视频| 91麻豆精品国产91久久久更新时间| 亚洲精品一区二区三区香蕉| 亚洲福利视频一区二区| 日本道欧美一区二区aaaa| 国91精品久久久久9999不卡|