"/>
欧美精品在线第一页,久久av影院,午夜视频在线播放一三,久久91精品久久久久久秒播,成人一区三区,久久综合狠狠综合久久狠狠色综合,成人av一区二区亚洲精,欧美a级在线观看

Protectionist tariffs no solution for U.S. trade imbalance

Source: Xinhua    2018-03-30 16:38:00

CHICAGO, March 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. protectionist measures of unilaterally imposing steep tariffs will not solve trade problem but risk opening a Pandora's box to backfire on its own economy, said U.S. experts.

"The recent action by U.S. President (Donald) Trump to slap tariffs on China outside of the established WTO rules ... is troubling," Tom Watkins, an advisor to Michigan-China Innovation Center, told Xinhua in a recent interview.

"While it has some short term political benefit to President Trump's political base of disenfranchised voters, it is unlikely to have any significant long-term economic benefit to working class people in America, nor address real issue of free and fair trade imbalances," Watkins said.

Many U.S. scholars echoed Watkins' view, as Trump signed a memorandum last week that could impose tariffs on up to 60 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China and place restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

China's Ministry of Commerce issued a warning the following day and also announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs on imported U.S. products worth about 3 billion dollars, targeting 128 categories of U.S. products including pork, wine and seamless steel tubes.

"Tariffs are not going to correct the trade deficit with China," said Khairy Tourk, a professor with the Stuart School of Business of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago. "The reality is that the tariff burden will fall on the silent majority, the consumers. This would be difficult for the middle class and it could backfire on those responsible for the price increases."

Tourk said China's measured response shows that Beijing is not eager to start a trade war. "Obviously, if the situation is to escalate, the global economy will suffer," the expert added.

"A trade war only disadvantages our already disadvantaged populations," said William J. Carroll, president emeritus of the Benedictine University.

U.S. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) posted a statement on its website the same day when Trump signed the memorandum, in which NPPC President Jim Heimerl said higher tariffs on imports from China will in turn harm U.S. producers and undermine the rural economy.

"No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers," said Heimerl.

U.S. pork industry exported 1.1 billion dollars of products to China in 2017. "China is a very important market for U.S. pork producers. In 2017, China was the second largest U.S. pork export market by volume and the third largest export market by value," Jim Monroe, NPPC senior communications director, told Xinhua.

Scholars said U.S. trade deficit is a problem, but not in the way Trump's administration thinks. "The deficit reflects lack of savings," said Tourk. It in fact reflects a deeper problem of imbalance in the flow of international investment.

"The best policy to increase American exports is to increase productivity," the professor said, adding this will require years to accomplish.

Editor: Zhou Xin
Related News
Xinhuanet

Protectionist tariffs no solution for U.S. trade imbalance

Source: Xinhua 2018-03-30 16:38:00

CHICAGO, March 29 (Xinhua) -- U.S. protectionist measures of unilaterally imposing steep tariffs will not solve trade problem but risk opening a Pandora's box to backfire on its own economy, said U.S. experts.

"The recent action by U.S. President (Donald) Trump to slap tariffs on China outside of the established WTO rules ... is troubling," Tom Watkins, an advisor to Michigan-China Innovation Center, told Xinhua in a recent interview.

"While it has some short term political benefit to President Trump's political base of disenfranchised voters, it is unlikely to have any significant long-term economic benefit to working class people in America, nor address real issue of free and fair trade imbalances," Watkins said.

Many U.S. scholars echoed Watkins' view, as Trump signed a memorandum last week that could impose tariffs on up to 60 billion U.S. dollars of imports from China and place restrictions on Chinese investments in the United States.

China's Ministry of Commerce issued a warning the following day and also announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs on imported U.S. products worth about 3 billion dollars, targeting 128 categories of U.S. products including pork, wine and seamless steel tubes.

"Tariffs are not going to correct the trade deficit with China," said Khairy Tourk, a professor with the Stuart School of Business of the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago. "The reality is that the tariff burden will fall on the silent majority, the consumers. This would be difficult for the middle class and it could backfire on those responsible for the price increases."

Tourk said China's measured response shows that Beijing is not eager to start a trade war. "Obviously, if the situation is to escalate, the global economy will suffer," the expert added.

"A trade war only disadvantages our already disadvantaged populations," said William J. Carroll, president emeritus of the Benedictine University.

U.S. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) posted a statement on its website the same day when Trump signed the memorandum, in which NPPC President Jim Heimerl said higher tariffs on imports from China will in turn harm U.S. producers and undermine the rural economy.

"No one wins in these tit-for-tat trade disputes, least of all the farmers and the consumers," said Heimerl.

U.S. pork industry exported 1.1 billion dollars of products to China in 2017. "China is a very important market for U.S. pork producers. In 2017, China was the second largest U.S. pork export market by volume and the third largest export market by value," Jim Monroe, NPPC senior communications director, told Xinhua.

Scholars said U.S. trade deficit is a problem, but not in the way Trump's administration thinks. "The deficit reflects lack of savings," said Tourk. It in fact reflects a deeper problem of imbalance in the flow of international investment.

"The best policy to increase American exports is to increase productivity," the professor said, adding this will require years to accomplish.

[Editor: huaxia]
010020070750000000000000011100001370774261
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品少妇一区二区| 人人玩人人添人人澡97| 中文字幕久久精品一区| 国产精品第56页| 亚洲欧美日韩精品在线观看| 欧美系列一区| 亚洲伊人久久影院| 欧美二区在线视频| 欧美一级不卡| 国产另类一区| 国产一区二区二| 国产日韩欧美色图| 视频一区二区三区欧美| 日韩一级免费视频| 国产精品亚洲а∨天堂123bt| 亚洲精品国产一区二区三区| 国产在线播放一区二区| 91久久国产露脸精品国产| 国产一区二区二| 亚洲国产精品女主播| 国产日韩欧美综合在线| 色妞妞www精品视频| 午夜理伦影院| 欧美亚洲精品一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕在线一区二区| 免费毛片a| 免费在线观看国产精品| 一区二区精品久久| 91夜夜夜| 午夜亚洲国产理论片一二三四 | 日韩国产精品久久| 欧美一区二区三区三州| 日本精品一二三区| 亚洲网久久| 少妇又紧又色又爽又刺激视频网站| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码视频 | 国产理论片午午午伦夜理片2021 | 久久激情影院| 欧美一区二区伦理片| 免费看欧美中韩毛片影院| 国产女人与拘做受免费视频| 亚洲欧洲一区| 国产免费第一区| 97欧美精品| 国产精自产拍久久久久久蜜| 欧美在线视频一二三区| 国产欧美一区二区三区精品观看| 欧美精品一卡二卡| 蜜臀久久99精品久久久 | 日韩无遮挡免费视频| 免费xxxx18美国| 国产欧美一区二区三区在线| 日韩精品免费一区| 一区二区三区在线观看国产| 丰满岳妇伦4在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久网站| 91精品国产综合久久福利软件| 久久精品麻豆| 欧美一区免费| 狠狠色狠狠综合久久| 精品国产品香蕉在线 | 欧美3p激情一区二区三区猛视频| 欧美日韩三区| 国产91丝袜在线播放动漫| 一区二区久久久久| 国产91免费在线| 日本精品99| 国产在线不卡一区| 国内精品久久久久久久星辰影视| 一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品日产欧美久久久久| 欧美日韩一区二区三区不卡| 日韩久久电影| 久久免费视频一区| 免费视频拗女稀缺一区二区| 亚洲福利视频一区| 538在线一区二区精品国产| 理论片午午伦夜理片在线播放| 久久精品亚洲一区二区三区画质| 日本免费电影一区二区三区| 国产视频一区二区视频| 91精品中综合久久久婷婷|